Existing programs to assist low-income beneficiaries with Medicare cost-sharing, premiums, and Part D prescription drug costs leave substantial gaps in protection for Medicare’s low-income beneficiaries. Low-income beneficiaries are most likely to have only Medicare coverage, and least likely to be protected by employer-sponsored retiree coverage. Given the cost, few low-income beneficiaries buy private Medigap supplements.
Almost two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries living in the community rely on some level of long-term services and supports, including personal care at home. These services are not covered under Medicare. One in 12 beneficiaries with high long-term care needs reported spending more than $1,000 in 2015 on assistive devices.
Among Medicare beneficiaries who report needing help or having difficulty with an activity, many experience adverse consequences because their support needs are not met. They are at greater risk of hospitalization, nursing home placement, and entry into Medicaid. In addition, they experience lower quality of life because of difficulty toileting, going outside, and moving around the house.
Economic Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Beneficiaries
During the COVID-19 pandemic, workers age 65 and older have experienced a surge in unemployment, rising to 15.6 percent in April 2020 from 3.7 percent in March, exceeding the unemployment rate for workers ages 25 to 54 by three percentage points. Unemployment also has risen sharply for workers approaching Medicare eligibility: 12.5 percent of workers ages 55 to 64 were unemployed in April, up fourfold from March.
Older workers are less likely to become reemployed than younger workers and, as a result, are more likely to simply retire and drop out of the labor force, taking Social Security as early as age 62. However, retirees who enroll in Social Security at age 62 receive 30 percent less each month than those who wait until age 67. In addition, those who retire early have less time to build up savings and are more likely to tap into those savings sooner.
All of these effects are compounded for minority and low-income Medicare beneficiaries who experience higher levels of unemployment, have lower incomes, and less accumulated savings. Fifteen percent of non-Hispanic white individuals over age 65 have incomes below 150 percent of poverty, but rates for Hispanic elderly people (36%) and Black elderly people (32%) are more than twice as high.
Minority elderly people have disproportionately lower earnings during their working years, are less likely to have retirement pensions, and have a higher incidence of chronic disease and uncovered health care expenses. As a result, seniors in racial/ethnic minority groups have, on average, greater health care needs and fewer are able to save for retirement. The age-adjusted hospitalization rate because of COVID-19 is 4.6 times higher among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic people, than non-Hispanic white people.
Medicare Policy Changes in Response to the Pandemic
Medicare policy changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic have been largely focused on providing financial assistance to hospitals and health care providers and easing regulatory requirements. The CARES Act increased Medicare payments to hospitals for COVID-19 patients by 20 percent.
Two important changes have been made to Medicare benefits. First, Medicare explicitly covers COVID-19 tests with no beneficiary cost-sharing. It also covers COVID-19 antibody (or “serology”) tests that have been authorized by the Food and Drug Administration.
Second, Medicare has temporarily covered telehealth visits. As a result, beneficiaries who are sheltering in place can minimize the risk of exposure to the coronavirus by obtaining care from their physicians and other health care providers by telephone, audiovisual technology, or website portals. Services covered include virtual check-ins, mental health counseling, and preventive health screening. Such services, other than preventive health screenings, are subject to regular Medicare cost-sharing requirements.
Policy Recommendations
Research is needed on policy changes that will assist Medicare beneficiaries contracting the coronavirus, as well as ensure affordability and coverage for all beneficiaries. The cost and impact of a range of policy solutions needs to be estimated, using different scenarios related to the spread of COVID-19. These policy solutions include the following:
Waiving Cost-Sharing
One immediate action that would address financial worries among Medicare beneficiaries who contract the coronavirus would be to waive cost-sharing for those who don’t have supplemental coverage. While fewer than one in 10 beneficiaries rely on Medicare alone, this group is disproportionately low-income. This targeted action would provide immediate assurance to beneficiaries that they will not face financial hardship by seeking needed care to combat this disease.
Medicare as a Choice for Older Adults
Given the high rate of unemployment of those approaching eligibility for Medicare, consideration should be given to a targeted policy of offering Medicare as a choice for older adults ages 55 to 64.
Medicare Extra
Reduce Medicare cost-sharing for Part A to $100 per year and place a ceiling of $3,500 on beneficiary out-of-pocket costs. The authors estimated that these improved benefits would have cost Medicare an additional $44 per beneficiary per month in 2016.
Low-Income Subsidies
With more Medicare beneficiaries facing financial hardship, priority should be given to providing assistance with premiums and cost-sharing to all Medicare beneficiaries with incomes below 150 percent of the poverty level. Prior research estimates that this targeted low-income reform would help an estimated 8.1 million Medicare beneficiaries who do not currently receive Medicaid or extra assistance. Updated research estimating the cost and benefit of administering low-income assistance directly through Medicare without an asset test (similar to the Part D low-income assistance test) is needed.
Coverage of Dental, Vision, and Hearing Services
Research is also needed on options for adding a dental, vision, and hearing services package of benefits to traditional Medicare. One promising option is a targeted benefit under Part B, which was passed by the House of Representatives in 2019 as part of the Elijah E. Cummings Lower Drug Costs Now Act [H.R.3]. A beginning step would be to cover preventive and maintenance dental, vision, and hearing services, such as dental cleanings or hearing loss rehabilitation services that were postponed or neglected during the pandemic.
Medicare Help at Home
One option for helping Medicare beneficiaries continue to live independently is to provide targeted home- and community-based services for these beneficiaries. For instance, this benefit might cover up to 20 hours weekly of personal care for individuals with two or more functional limitations or severe cognitive impairments. An alternative incremental approach would be to extend the same flexibility to providers who care for traditional Medicare beneficiaries that is currently afforded to Medicare Advantage plans to provide nonmedical benefits, including personal care, meal delivery services, or home modifications. Eligibility for additional nonmedical services could be linked with the eligibility process for the Part D low-income subsidy. This would reduce administrative burden while prioritizing beneficiaries with the highest needs.
Medicare Part A Solvency
The economic downturn, likely to be the deepest since the Great Depression, will result in a sharp reduction in payroll tax revenues that are used to finance Medicare Part A, which covers hospital and posthospital care. In April 2020, the Medicare trustees projected that the Part A trust fund will be insolvent by 2026 under prepandemic conditions. It is anticipated that the trust fund depletion date could differ substantially from this estimate as a result of the health and economic impacts of the pandemic.
Previous debates on how to ensure trust fund solvency raised concerns about shifting more costs to beneficiaries. Alternatively, consideration should be given to merging the Part A and Part B trust funds and ensuring that general revenues are committed to maintaining fiscal solvency. Research on new sources of revenue that could ensure the financial stability of the program postpandemic could help identify the best way forward. A recent study has estimated the effect of options of ensuring adequate financing, including:
- shifting home health benefits to Part B
- implementing site-neutral payments for all hospitals
- adjusting the physician add-on to the Part B drug reimbursement structure
- competitive bidding for Medicare Advantage.
Conclusion
Although Medicare provides a stable, trusted source of health insurance for older adults and younger people with disabilities, the program’s benefit design can leave beneficiaries exposed to high out-of-pocket costs and premiums. In the current crisis, this is particularly a concern for those without supplemental coverage. Waiving cost-sharing for beneficiaries with COVID-19 would provide immediate assistance. Offering Medicare as a choice for older adults ages 55 to 64 and waiving cost-sharing for those with COVID-19 would similarly assist a vulnerable population experiencing job loss and dim prospects for reemployment. Longer-term, the policies described in this issue brief could help all Medicare beneficiaries, significantly lowering their risk of high cost burdens and ensuring access to care for Medicare’s elderly and disabled beneficiaries.